(OP-ED)— Based on the current set of research scenarios, it appears many litigants let emotions rather than fact do their thinking … and eventually “talking” for them. Here’s one such case that just recently emerged out of a probate case in Idaho:
One way to get yourself labeled as such is to keep repeatedly entering into their forums with allegations that have zero evidentiary support behind them. This scenario takes me back in time to a situation where knowing a fact exists and knowing how to go get at it, fails when one isn’t prepared:
OOPS! (Yes, I know, but it’s the simplest way to explain the court’s logic!)
Now that I’ve made my point …
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Dave’s Newsletter to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.